Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Public health ; 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2034015

ABSTRACT

Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between test site availability and testing rate within the context of social determinants of health. Study Design A retrospective ecological investigation was conducted using statewide COVID-19 testing data between March 2020 and December 2021. Methods Ordinary least squares and geographically weighted regression were used to estimate state and zip code level associations between testing rate and testing sites per capita, adjusting for neighbourhood level confounders. Results Findings indicate that site availability is positively associated with the zip code level testing rate and that this association is amplified in communities of greater economic deprivation. Additionally, economic deprivation is a key factor for consideration when examining ethnic differences in testing in medically underserved states. Conclusion The study findings could be used to guide delivery of testing facilities in resource-constrained states.

2.
Clin Cardiol ; 45(5): 536-539, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1733857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Compare proportion of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among West Virginia Medicaid enrollees who were discharged from infective endocarditis (IE) hospitalization with and without opioid use disorder (OUD) diagnosis. METHODS: The proportions of cause-specific deaths among those who were discharged from IE-related hospitalizations were compared by OUD diagnosis. RESULTS: The top three underlying causes of death discharged from IE hospitalization were accidental drug poisoning, mental and behavioral disorders due to polysubstance use, and cardiovascular diseases. Of the total deaths occurring among patients discharged after IE-related hospitalization, the proportion has increased seven times from 2016 to 2019 among the OUD deaths while it doubled among the non-OUD deaths. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Of the total deaths occurring among patients discharged after IE-related hospitalization, the increase is higher in those with OUD diagnosis. OUD is becoming a significantly negative impactor on the survival outcome among IE patients. It is of growing importance to deliver medication for OUD treatment and harm reduction efforts to IE patients in a timely manner, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic persists.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Opioid-Related Disorders , Cause of Death , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Hospitalization , Humans , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pandemics , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , United States , West Virginia/epidemiology
3.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259538, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1502077

ABSTRACT

During the COVID-19 pandemic, West Virginia developed an aggressive SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy which included utilizing pop-up mobile testing in locations anticipated to have near-term increases in SARS-CoV-2 infections. This study describes and compares two methods for predicting near-term SARS-CoV-2 incidence in West Virginia counties. The first method, Rt Only, is solely based on producing forecasts for each county using the daily instantaneous reproductive numbers, Rt. The second method, ML+Rt, is a machine learning approach that uses a Long Short-Term Memory network to predict the near-term number of cases for each county using epidemiological statistics such as Rt, county population information, and time series trends including information on major holidays, as well as leveraging statewide COVID-19 trends across counties and county population size. Both approaches used daily county-level SARS-CoV-2 incidence data provided by the West Virginia Department Health and Human Resources beginning April 2020. The methods are compared on the accuracy of near-term SARS-CoV-2 increases predictions by county over 17 weeks from January 1, 2021- April 30, 2021. Both methods performed well (correlation between forecasted number of cases and the actual number of cases week over week is 0.872 for the ML+Rt method and 0.867 for the Rt Only method) but differ in performance at various time points. Over the 17-week assessment period, the ML+Rt method outperforms the Rt Only method in identifying larger spikes. Results show that both methods perform adequately in both rural and non-rural predictions. Finally, a detailed discussion on practical issues regarding implementing forecasting models for public health action based on Rt is provided, and the potential for further development of machine learning methods that are enhanced by Rt.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Forecasting/methods , Machine Learning , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Models, Statistical , Predictive Value of Tests , Rural Population , West Virginia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL